Showing posts with label R21. Show all posts
Showing posts with label R21. Show all posts

Friday, April 8, 2016

NEI Research Grant for Vision Related Secondary Data Analysis

Agency: NEI
Funding Opportunity Title: NEI Research Grant for Vision Related Secondary Data Analysis
Funding Opportunity Number: PAR-16-168
Due Date: Standard Due Dates, June 16, October 16 and February 16

Summary:
The goal of this funding opportunity announcement (FOA) is to fund meritorious vision related research projects that involve secondary data analyses using existing database resources. The development of statistical methodology necessary for improving methods to analyze vision health data using existing vision data may also be proposed.

Research Objectives:
The NEI supports an extensive portfolio of clinical trials and large-scale epidemiologic research project wherein numerous data collection activities are required to meet each project's specific aims.  The resultant wealth of data generated by these studies often provides unique, cost-effective opportunities to pursue new questions. 

This FOA may be used to develop new statistical methodologies or to test new hypotheses using existing data.  This FOA actively encourages the use of existing database resources to conduct additional analyses secondary to a project's originally-intended primary purpose; it will not support the collection of new data. 

This FOA supports secondary data analysis on existing data sets. A typical project is expected to make substantial progress towards having vision related manuscript(s) submitted in peer reviewed journals within the first year.

Data sets are not limited to those collected under NEI support but these data sets are of the highest programmatic interest.  Applicants should consider the relevance of their proposed analyses to NEI programs and priorities as described in the National Plan for Eye and Vision Research, which is available on the NEI website. http://www.nei.nih.gov.

The full program announcement can be found at the NIH Guide. 

Wednesday, October 21, 2015

Upcoming Changes to NIH Grant Instructions and Forms

NIH is making quite a few changes to the NIH grant instructions and forms.  The changes will be implemented in two phases with the first phase effecting grants due on or after January 25, 2016 and the second phase effecting grants due on or after May 25, 2016.  Here are the areas that will be impacted and guide notices explaining the changes so you can familiarize yourself with them.

Phase I Changes – Effective on or after January 25, 2016

Rigor and Transparency in Research
– NIH is changing application requirements and review language to enhance reproducibility of research findings through increased scientific rigor and transparency. These changes will take effect for most research grant applications (including small business and complex research grant applications), but will not impact institutional training and individual fellowship applications until Phase II.  Changes include:

Updates to application guide instructions for preparing your research strategy attachment
Use of a new "Authentication of Key Biological and/or Chemical Resources" attachment (uploaded in Other Attachments section of R&R Other Project Information form)
Additional rigor and transparency questions reviewers will be asked to consider when reviewing applications

NIH Guide Notice

Vertebrate Animals – NIH is removing redundancy with Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee review while meeting the requirements of the Public Health Service Policy on Humane Care and Use of Laboratory Animals. Changes include:

Updated guidance on criteria to be addressed (description of procedures; justifications; minimization of pain and distress; and euthanasia)
A description of veterinary care is no longer required
Justification for the number of animals has been eliminated
A description and justification of the method of euthanasia is required only if the method is not consistent with AVMA Guidelines for the Euthanasia of Animals

NIH Guide Notice

Definition of Child – NIH is redefining the age of a child for the purposes of NIH's inclusion policy to individuals under 18 years old instead of under 21 years old.

NIH Guide Notice
 
Research Training – NIH is updating requirements and instructions for several attachments on the PHS 398 Research Training Program Plan form to reflect recent policy guidance and reduce applicant burden. Changes include:

"Recruitment and Retention Plan to Enhance Diversity" - applicants will be asked to focus on recruitment
"Human Subjects" - applicants must describe how the institution will ensure that trainees only participate in exempt human subjects research or non-exempt human subjects research that has IRB approval; no longer necessary to provide a list of potential grants trainees may work on and associated IRB information
"Vertebrate Animals" - applicants must describe how the institution will ensure that trainees only participate in vertebrate animal research that has IACUC approval; no longer necessary to provide a list of potential grants trainees may work on and associated IACUC information
"Progress Report" - requirement to report on publications that arose from work conducted by the trainee while supported by the training grant will be moved to the Just-in-Time process

Phase II changes – effective on or after May 25, 2016
New grant forms will be released. In addition the following changes will also take effect:

Rigor and Transparency
– NIH is extending Phase 1 changes to include institutional training and individual fellowship applications. They are adding a new "Authentication of Key Biological and/or Chemical Resources" attachment to the following forms in FORMS-D application packages:

PHS 398 Research Plan
PHS 398 Career Development Supplemental Form
PHS Fellowship Supplemental Form
New “Plan for the Instruction in Methods for Enhancing Reproducibility” attachment will be added to the PHS 398 Research Training Program Plan form in FORMS-D application packages.

NIH Guide Notice

Vertebrate Animals – NIH is extending Phase 1 changes to include institutional training and individual fellowship applications. They are adding new questions regarding euthanasia to the following forms in FORMS-D application packages to replace the euthanasia criteria in the vertebrate animals section:
PHS 398 Research Plan
PHS Fellowship Supplemental Form
Inclusion Reporting – NIH is adding an optional PHS Inclusion Enrollment Report form to FORMS-D application packages. The new form, with additional study descriptors, will replace the optional Planned Enrollment Report and Cumulative Inclusion Enrollment Report forms found in FORMS-C application packages. They will provide more details about these changes prior to release of the updated forms.

Data Safety Monitoring – NIH is adding a new “Data Safety Monitoring Plan” to the following forms in FORMS-D application packages:

PHS 398 Research Plan
PHS 398 Career Development Supplemental Form
PHS Fellowship Supplemental Form
PHS 398 Research Training Program Plan
This new attachment must be included with all applications involving clinical trials.

Although the requirement of a data and safety monitoring plan for clinical trials is not new, the use of a separate attachment to collect this information will emphasize its importance and facilitate systematic enforcement of its presence.

Research Training – NIH is changing the research training data table format. Changes include:

Reducing the number of tables from 12 to 8
Minimizing the reporting of individual-level information
Extending the tracking of trainee outcomes from 10 to 15 years
NIH’s xTRACT system to help applicants prepare the new tables will be available October 16, 2015.

NIH Guide Notice

Appendices – NIH is reevaluating the current appendix policy. A notice describing specific appendix policy changes will be issued by spring 2016.

New PHS Assignment Request Form (Formerly a Cover Letter) - NIH is adding an optional PHS Assignment Request Form to FORMS-D application packages to provide a consistent way to collect application referral information, including:

Awarding component (NIH institute) assignment preference
Study Section preference
List of potential reviewers in conflict, and why
List of scientific expertise needed to review the application

NIH Guide Notice

Font Requirements -  NIH is providing additional flexibility regarding the fonts allowed in PDF attachments included in grant applications. Although they will continue to recommend specific fonts, they will also allow other fonts (both serif and non-serif) as long as they comply with specific type density and line spacing guidelines.

NIH Guide Notice

Biosketch Clarifications – NIH  is clarifying biosketch instructions. Clarifications include:

Indicating that a URL for a publication list is optional and, if provided, must be to a government website (.gov) like My Bibliography
Allowing publications (peer-reviewed and non-peer-reviewed) and research products to be cited in both the personal statement and the contributions to science sections
Explicitly stating that graphics, figures and tables are not allowed

Wednesday, December 26, 2012

NEI Research Grant for Secondary Analysis (R21)


Funding Opportunity: NEI Research Grant for Secondary Analysis (R21)
Funding Opportunity Number: PAR-13-035
Application Due Date: February 16, June 16, and October 16 for New Submissions

Summary:

The NEI supports an extensive portfolio of clinical trials and large-scale epidemiologic research projects, wherein numerous data collection activities are required to meet each project's specific aims.  The resultant wealth of data generated by these studies often provides unique, cost-effective opportunities to pursue new questions.  This initiative may be used to develop new statistical methodologies or to test new hypotheses using existing data.  While this initiative actively encourages the use of existing database resources to conduct exploratory/developmental research secondary to a project's originally-intended purpose, it will not support the collection of new data.  Datasets are not limited to those collected under NEI support but these data are of the highest programmatic interest.  Applicants should consider the relevance of their proposed analyses to NEI programs and priorities as described in the National Plan for Eye and Vision Research, which is available at http://www.nei.nih.gov.

This FOA issued by the National Eye Institute (NEI), National Institutes of Health (NIH), encourages applications from institutions/organizations that propose to conduct secondary data analyses utilizing existing database resources.  Applications may be related to, but must be distinct from, the specific aims of the original data collection.

Award Budget Information:

The combined budget for direct costs for the two-year project period may not exceed $275,000.  No more than $200,000 may be requested in any single year.  Applicants may request direct costs in $25,000 modules, up to the total direct costs limitation of $275,000 for the combined two-year award period.

Program Website


Thursday, September 13, 2012

Basic Behavioral Research on Multisensory Processing

Agency: NIH
Deadline: October 31, 2012

Summary:

Scope and Specific Requirements
Applications submitted in response to this FOA are expected to propose projects that will further our understanding of how multisensory input influences basic perceptual and behavioral processes. Successful applications will examine two or more senses (visual, auditory, olfactory, gustatory, non-pain somatosensory, vestibular). This FOA encourages innovative studies that examine the influence of interactions among multisensory inputs on perception and behavior, or identify individual and lifespan differences in and moderators of multisensory perception and basic behavioral outcomes. The initiative encourages the use of diverse methodologies, including experimental psychophysics, “real world” settings, immersive virtual technology, and animal models.

This initiative will target projects that examine how causal interplay among the senses influences integrated perceptual behavior, rather than projects that aim to understand neural circuits and activity within the human brain itself (which are targeted in existing investments such as the Human Connectome Project within the Neuroscience Blueprint). Basic behavioral multisensory science projects will be considered if the primary questions and outcomes of the research emphasize perception or behavior. Projects will be deemed non-responsive if the primary thrusts of the questions and outcomes are limited to neural circuits or neural mechanisms that underlie behavioral responses to sensory input. Neurobiological approaches may be included if they will augment our knowledge of multisensory influences on perceptual or behavioral outcomes.

Applications for research focused on the perception of pain or applied research are outside the scope of this FOA and will be deemed non-responsive. Pain-related research is targeted in existing investments such as the NIH Pain Consortium and the NIH Blueprint for Neuroscience Research Grand Challenge on Pain. As defined by NIH, applied research in the behavioral and social sciences is designed to predict or influence health outcomes, risks, or protective factors. It is also concerned with the impact of illness or risk for illness on behavioral or social functioning. Applied research on multisensory processing as it relates to specific diseases, health conditions, intervention, or treatment outcomes will be deemed non-responsive.

Applications submitted under this mechanism should break new ground or extend previous discoveries toward new directions or applications. These studies may involve considerable scientific risk but may lead to a breakthrough in a particular area, or to the development of novel techniques, methodologies, models, or applications that could have a major impact on basic behavioral and/or social sciences research.  By using the R21 mechanism, the NIH seeks to foster the introduction of novel scientific ideas, model systems, tools, targets, and technologies that have the potential to substantially advance bBSSR.

Specific Areas of Research Interest
Below are examples of projects that would examine how multisensory input influences perception and behavior. This list is not meant to be exhaustive, but only to provide examples of appropriate topics. For feedback on specific topics, please consult the program staff listed in the program announcement.
  • In what ways are perceptions affected by multisensory input? What is the role of cognitive and/or affective processing in multisensory integration (i.e., bottom-up/top-down processing)?
  • How do affective experiences or other psychological and volitional states modify the ways in which multisensory input are integrated with cognitive expectations to produce perceptions?
  • What is the role of multiple sensory system integration in dynamic activities such as navigation (where multi-sensory and sensorimotor processing change sensory input, and vice versa) or social interactions/communication (where sensorimotor feedback loops affect the perceptions of the sender and receiver in a communication encounter)?
  • Can individual differences of normal multisensory integration be identified? Are there physical features (in sensory organs), biomarkers (genetic or non-genetic), or brain features (e.g., structural differences/ activation patterns) that underlie these variations?
  • Are there developmental differences in multisensory mechanisms and influence on perception and behavior across the lifespan?
Because this FOA targets basic behavioral and social science research approaches to understanding the influence of multisensory integration on perception and behavior, examples of research projects that will NOT be considered responsive to the FOA include, but are not limited to:
  • Research examining only one sensory modality
  • Research on pain
  • Research with the primary or singular objective of identifying neural circuits or neural mechanisms that underlie behavioral responses to sensory input.
  • Studies with a primary focus on prospective or descriptive epidemiology (e.g., observational studies with no focus on understanding underlying mechanistic processes).
  • Descriptive research documenting individual or group differences without investigating the mechanisms and processes explaining these differences
  • Clinical interventions or treatment studies, effectiveness trial, or implementation/ dissemination of interventions
  • Research designed to predict or influence health outcomes, risks, or protective factors
  • Research concerned with the impact of illness or risk for illness on behavioral or social functioning